ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ



ਪ੍ਰੇਸ ਰਿਲੀਜ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸਟੇਟਮੇੰਟ
Respected Sir: Could the ICJ order be implemented morally, if not legally?
Respected Sir: Could the ICJ order be implemented morally, if not legally?
Page Visitors: 1291

 

Respected Sir: Could the ICJ order be implemented morally, if not legally?

Attention Please: Thanks
U.S. President, Joe Biden
https://www.facebook.com/
joebiden

PMO Office-Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/PMOIndia

Former U.S. President, Barack Obama
https://www.facebook.com/barackobama 
Indian Justice System Does Speak Against Injustice Selectively Like Indian Judge Did At International Court Of Justice (ICJ), But Justice System Helpless Before Indian Rulers In India 
Observed By: Balbir Singh Sooch- Sikh Vichar Manch
http://thekhalsa.org/frame.
php?path=342&article=26238
Indian Justice System Does Speak Against Injustice Selectively Like Indian Judge Did At International Court Of Justice (ICJ), But Justice System Helpless Before Indian Rulers In India:
Indian Judge on ICJ Votes to Stop Russian Military Operations in 13-2 Decision: India is one of two countries to have voted for the majority judgment by going against their countries' respective ballots at the March 2 UNGA resolution on Ukraine.
  https://thewire.in/world/
indian-judge-dalveer-bhandari-icj-russia-ukraine
The United States Wednesday welcomed an International Court of Justice order that asked Russia to immediately suspend its military operations in Ukraine. India’s judge voted against Russia while China’s judge opposed the orders
Describing it as a significant ruling, State Department Spokesperson Ned Price said that the ICJ “clearly and unequivocally” ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military operations.
“The Russian Federation shall immediately suspend military operations that it commenced on 24 February, 2022  on the territory of Ukraine,” presiding judge Joan Donoghue told the International Court of Justice, pending the final decision in the case. India’s judge, Justice Dalveer Bhandari, voted against Russia.
The court order was supported by 13 judges while two voted against it. This includes Vice-President Kirill Gevorgian from Russia and Judge Xue Hanqin from China.
“We welcome the court order and call on the Russian Federation to comply with the order, immediately cease its military operations in Ukraine, and to establish unhindered humanitarian access in Ukraine,” Price said.
In its ruling, the court — which plays a vital role in peaceful settlement of disputes under the UN Charter — stressed the need for States to act in conformity with their obligations under international law, including the laws of war, Price said.
“And the Court expressed deep concern about the extreme vulnerability of the civilian population of Ukraine, the numerous civilian deaths and injuries that have resulted from the Kremlin’s actions, and the significant material damage, including the destruction of buildings and infrastructure,” he said.
The Court further noted its profound concern with the Russian government’s use of force and emphasised the Court’s acute awareness of “the extent of the human tragedy that is taking place in Ukraine as well as the “continuing loss of life and human suffering”.
The Court also observed that it did not possess any evidence substantiating Russia’s claims that genocide had been committed by Ukraine in the Donbas region, he said. Judge Xue Hanqin from China opposed the order.
Ukraine’s contention that the Russian Federation’s allegation of genocide against Ukraine is just “an excuse for Russia’s unlawful aggression” raises doubt that this is a genuine case about genocide, she wrote in her dissent note.
“It appears that the acts complained of by Ukraine namely Russia’s recognition of the independence of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions of Ukraine and Russia’s military operations in Ukraine cannot be directly addressed by the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Genocide Convention, as the issues they have raised are concerned with the questions of recognition and use of force in international law,” she said.    https://indianexpress.com/
article/world/international-court-of-justice-india-russia-ukraine-invasion-7823685/
The threat to human rights is the highest in police stations as custodial torture and other police atrocities still prevail in India and even the privileged are "not spared third-degree treatment", Chief Justice of India N V Ramana said on Sunday while batting for a nationwide effort for the "sensitisation of police:
 https://www.business-standard.
com/article/current-affairs/threat-to-human-rights-is-highest-in-police-stations-cji-n-v-ramana-121080800653_1.html#:~:text=Justice%20of%20India-,The%20threat%20to%20human%20rights%20is%20the%20highest%20in%20police,for%20the%20%22sensitisation%20of%20police
Bhagwant Mann assumed charge as the Punjab Chief Minister in Chandigarh on Wednesday, March 16, 2022::
http://www.thekhalsa.org/
frame.php?path=342&article=27100
The event was supposed to start at 12.30 PM but got delayed and began at 1.25 PM.
“However, the swear-in ceremony is said to be delayed from the scheduled time due to bad weather: ABP NEWS ”??? Though, the truth may never come out, but the time of delay might have taken to influence and pressurise
Bhagwant Mann to edit his speech as desired by the central agencies of India?   http://www.thekhalsa.org/
frame.php?path=342&article=27100
Did The Parliament Disruptions’ And The Rights Violations Forecast About My India?
http://thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=342&article=26238
Highlights Forwarded By: Balbir Singh Sooch- Sikh Vichar Manch
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/home.htm
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355
http://thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=342&article=26238
https://www.facebook.com/joebiden
At International Court Of Justice (ICJ), But Justice System Helpless Before Indian
 Rulers In India

©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.