ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ



Voice of People
The National Security Adviser (NSA) is not under political oversight-control, supervision, that’s why killers remain untraceable in India and outside?
The National Security Adviser (NSA) is not under political oversight-control, supervision, that’s why killers remain untraceable in India and outside?
Page Visitors: 2826


The massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 and of others

 


Couldn’t such untraceable killings be linked as a danger to the world security as such agencies are controlled and supervised only by the National Security Adviser (NSA) in India and outside?

By Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch

HIGHLIGHTS:

1. The National Security Adviser (NSA) is not under political oversight-control, supervision, that’s why killers remain untraceable in India and outside?

2. Home Minister P Chidambaram on Saturday, February 06, 2010 said the National Security Adviser (NSA) should have very few executive responsibilities over internal security which he felt must come under political oversight, "The only way that I could know what is going on, what happened and what did not happen, was to exercise political oversight over every agency that is concerned with security".

3. Is it not An Important Confession on the part of Home Minister P Chidambaram and further as to what inference can be drawn from it that such untraceable killers are no-one except to the knowledge of the National Security Adviser (NSA) in India and outside?

4. Will it not be more proper and rightly to say that such untraceable killers are no-one except to the knowledge of the National Security Adviser (NSA) in India?

5. Couldn’t such untraceable killings be linked as a danger to the world security as such agencies are controlled and supervised only by the National Security Adviser (NSA) in India and outside?

The massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 and of others

A. The Union minister Farooq Abdullah said only this much, ‘that the “some powers” had prevented him from probing the massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 on the eve of Bill Clinton’s visit to India’.

B. “I have some reservations about Chattisinghpora incident and I will make these public through my book.

C. The book will be released after my death so that nobody will question me”.

http://twocircles.net/2010jan…/diary_anti_sikh_massacre.html

http://www.sikharchives.com/?p=3134
http://moqm.v01.pnap.ioflood.com/…/cid_probe_ordered_blasts…

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/…/Finding_the_truth_in_the_Chittis…

D. But, though, about the “some powers, the Union minister Farooq Abdullah said only this much, ‘that the “some powers” had prevented him from probing the massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 on the eve of Bill Clinton’s visit to India’.

E. The Union minister Farooq Abdullah also stated that Clinton has truly written in his book that had he not visited India Chattisinghpora massacre would not have taken place, the NC president said, “I have some reservations about Chattisinghpora incident and I will make these public through my book.

F. The book will be released after my death so that nobody will question me”.

G. He did also criticise Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar) President Simranjeet Singh Mann for blaming troopers for the Chattisinghpora incident, “It is a senseless statement. We have nothing to do with Punjab politics.”

H. The Sikhs who are having awareness, may be from any party, group, organization etc do not dispute the role of “Some powers” in any form, in the Indian system from bottom to top. I like to explain a little more about The “Some Powers” and worth to quote as under:

I. “The Sikh Vichar Manch is being questioned by some innocent Sikhs and others in politics, what are the “some powers”?

J. I replied in short, “the powers” actually running or controlling the Indian system in the ‘Unitary System’ under the constitution of India.

Again, asked to elaborate more?

K. Of course, I only then replied, “the “some powers” was another name of the ‘Indian central agencies’.

L. But, though, about the “some powers, the Union minister Farooq Abdullah said only this much, ‘that the “some powers” had prevented him from probing the massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 on the eve of Bill Clinton’s visit to India’.

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/…/Finding_the_truth_in_the_Chittis…

SRINAGAR, India (Reuters)

M. India admits killing wrong men for massacre

N. Five men killed by Indian forces for the massacre of more than 30 Sikhs have been proved innocent, India has said

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/…/Finding_the_truth_in_the_Chittis…

http://www.sikharchives.com/?p=3134
http://twocircles.net/2010jan…/diary_anti_sikh_massacre.html

http://moqm.v01.pnap.ioflood.com/…/cid_probe_ordered_blasts…

P.S:

   
   
   

The National Security Adviser (NSA) is not under political oversight-control, supervision, that’s why killers remain untraceable in India and outside?

MOST RELATED TO THE INDIANS SECURITY AND LIBERTY IN INDIA and OUTSIDE:

The National Security Adviser (NSA) is not under political oversight-control, supervision, that’s why killers remain untraceable in India and outside?

 

©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.