ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ

New Directory Entries
Thursday Briefing: An impeachment motion in South Korea Inbox The New York Times Unsubscribe Wed, Dec 4, 11:00 PM (7 hours ago) to me View in browser|nytimes.com Ad Morning Briefing: Asia Pacific Edition December 5, 2024 Author Headshot By Gaya Gupta Good morning. We’re covering an impeachment motion in South Korea and France’s prime minister failing a no-confidence vote. Plus, what’s your most cherished holiday tradition? South Korean lawmakers protesting on the steps of the National Assembly holding white signs with red writing on them. Members of South Korea’s opposition parties protesting on the steps of the National Assembly in Seoul yesterday. Chang W. Lee/The New York Times South Korea’s president is facing an impeachment vote Members of South Korea’s political opposition yesterday moved to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol. The motion could be put to a vote as early as tomorrow, and comes after his declaration of martial law on Tuesday ended in spectacular failure. Several opposition parties filed the impeachment motion together. If the vote is successful, Yoon would be suspended from office and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo would become the interim president. Yoon’s fate would then go to the Constitutional Court, where the justices could uphold the impeachment and remove him from office, or reject it and reinstate him. Here’s how the process could unfold. Collateral damage: Yoon’s defense minister, chief of staff and other top aides had tendered their resignations, South Korean news media reported. Yoon will address the nation today, according to an official familiar with his plans. Context: Yoon’s surprise declaration of martial law on Tuesday was the first effort to impose military rule in more than four decades. The audacious move was an attempt to break a gridlock in government that has hobbled Yoon’s nearly three years in power. Several people in suits walk down a hallway carpeted in red. Prime Minister Michel Barnier of France, center, after the no-confidence vote yesterday. Sarah Meyssonnier/Reuters France’s prime minister lost a no-confidence vote French lawmakers passed a no-confidence measure against Prime Minister Michel Barnier and his cabinet yesterday, sending France into a fresh spasm of political turmoil. Barnier is expected to resign soon. France’s lower house of Parliament passed the measure with 331 votes — well above the required majority of 288 votes — after Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally joined the chamber’s leftist coalition. The move leaves France without a clear path to a new budget and threatens to further unsettle credit markets. It could also create a wider opening for the far right. What’s next: Barnier is likely to remain as a caretaker until President Emmanuel Macron names a new prime minister, but weeks of instability are on the horizon. Context: It was the first successful no-confidence vote in France in over 60 years, making Barnier’s three-month-old government the shortest-tenured in the history of France’s Fifth Republic. A head-and-shoulders portrait of Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth after meetings on Capitol Hill yesterday. Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Senators waver on Hegseth for defense secretary A small but pivotal group of Republican senators expressed concern yesterday about Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be defense secretary. Hegseth has been accused of sexual assault, public drunkenness and mismanagement while running veterans’ nonprofits. “Some of these articles are very disturbing,” Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump’s closest allies in Congress, told reporters. “He obviously has a chance to defend himself here, but, you know, some of this stuff is going to be difficult.” Trump yesterday named a senior counselor for trade and manufacturing and a possible overseer of NASA. Here are his latest picks. What’s your most cherished holiday tradition? For many of us, the holidays are full of traditions. Which ones are you most looking forward to this year? Maybe it’s something your family or friends have been doing for decades or a more recent creation that you can’t wait to repeat. Either way, we’d love to know about it. To share your thoughts, fill out this form. We may use your response in an upcoming newsletter. We won’t publish your submission without contacting you first.
Category:ਪ੍ਰੇਸ ਰਿਲੀਜ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸਟੇਟਮੇੰਟ



ਪ੍ਰੇਸ ਰਿਲੀਜ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸਟੇਟਮੇੰਟ
Sabh Sikhan ko Hukam hai, Guru Maniyo Granth.
Sabh Sikhan ko Hukam hai, Guru Maniyo Granth.
Page Visitors: 2640

Sabh Sikhan ko Hukam hai, Guru Maniyo Granth.

Dear The Khalsa  Moderator, Waheguru jee ka Khalsa Waheguru jee kee Fateh.

I don't know what is the problem from the very beginning of 2013 year because I don't make use of 'facebook' !

During 1469 to 1708 AD, whatever Gurus Sahibaan used to advise/teach, the Sangat followed with devotion and humility. Then during 1709 to 1944 CE), despite different views expressed by the various individual Writers, there had been no uniform Code of Conduct for the Sikhs EXCEPT the last Command by Guru Gobind Singh Sahib before breathing his last on 7 October 1708 that "SABH SIKHAN KO HUKAM HAI, GURU MANIYO GRANTH". Since then the Sikhs spread all over the world have been reading, reciting and following the "GURU GRANTH SAHIB". [from Jupp Jee Sahib to Mundavani at pages 1 to 1429]

This aspect is also made clear when The Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925 was enacted while establishing SGPC, whose role has been to manage the Historical Gurdwaras and to propagate the Guru's Teachings enshrined in the Guru Granth Sahib. If SGPC officials fail to perform the given functions, such a guilty person could be dismissed or sacked under Section 134 (g) of The Gurdwaras Act 1925, as amended. Moreover, its current jurisdiction prevails within Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and UT Chandigarh only. Patna Sahib, Hazur Sahib and Delhi have their own Legislations because SGPC does not control other States and countries.

The Sikh Diaspora does not need any instructions from any Pujari or SGPC because they can't override the Edict of Guru Gobind Singh Sahib as mentioned above. However, I have no hesitation to say that prior to 1945, then Sikhs were more "Pucca" in their Sikh Faith than after the imposing of Sikh Reht Maryada by the SGPC covering four regions only as stated above. In fact, Nitnem Banis are mentioned in the Guru Granth Sahib at pages 1 to 13 and if someone wishes to read more, he/she is free to recite from the Guru Granth Sahib, which is the Supreme Scripture for the Sikhs spread all over the world.

In the 17th Stanza of Jupp Jee Sahib, reference is made to "Asankh Granth" (countless Granths) but the Sikhs are required to obey one Granth only i. e. "Guru Granth Sahib". If someone reads other countless granths, no one can interfere though such an action does not conform to the Guru's Teachings.

My suggestion is, not to indulge in such futile discussions, because it leads to personal animosity.

  1. Guru Nanak Sahib has already cautioned us: [Asa Kee Vaar, Pauri 19 at GGS page 473] "Mandaa Kisaiy Na Aakhiyaiy Parr Akhur Aeho Bujheeaiy. Murkhaiy Naal Na lujheeaiy."
  2. Let us read Gurbani as Sikhs are friendly with all. Some Quotes Vide Attachment.
  3. Treacherous are those, who don't obey the Guru's Teachings enshrined in the Guru Granth Sahib but running their own personified deras and organizations.
  4. SGPC can't override Guru Granth Sahib and The Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925 and if they are doing, they should be dismissed or sacked under Section 134(g) ibid. Also read and understand Gurbani in the Guru Granth Sahib that Akall Purkh pervades everywhere and can't be housed in one building. Perhaps, SGPC and the Sikhs have forgotten the episode of Mecca?

Thanks,
Gurmit Singh (Sydney - Australia)

©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.