ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ

New Directory Entries
Thursday Briefing: An impeachment motion in South Korea Inbox The New York Times Unsubscribe Wed, Dec 4, 11:00 PM (7 hours ago) to me View in browser|nytimes.com Ad Morning Briefing: Asia Pacific Edition December 5, 2024 Author Headshot By Gaya Gupta Good morning. We’re covering an impeachment motion in South Korea and France’s prime minister failing a no-confidence vote. Plus, what’s your most cherished holiday tradition? South Korean lawmakers protesting on the steps of the National Assembly holding white signs with red writing on them. Members of South Korea’s opposition parties protesting on the steps of the National Assembly in Seoul yesterday. Chang W. Lee/The New York Times South Korea’s president is facing an impeachment vote Members of South Korea’s political opposition yesterday moved to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol. The motion could be put to a vote as early as tomorrow, and comes after his declaration of martial law on Tuesday ended in spectacular failure. Several opposition parties filed the impeachment motion together. If the vote is successful, Yoon would be suspended from office and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo would become the interim president. Yoon’s fate would then go to the Constitutional Court, where the justices could uphold the impeachment and remove him from office, or reject it and reinstate him. Here’s how the process could unfold. Collateral damage: Yoon’s defense minister, chief of staff and other top aides had tendered their resignations, South Korean news media reported. Yoon will address the nation today, according to an official familiar with his plans. Context: Yoon’s surprise declaration of martial law on Tuesday was the first effort to impose military rule in more than four decades. The audacious move was an attempt to break a gridlock in government that has hobbled Yoon’s nearly three years in power. Several people in suits walk down a hallway carpeted in red. Prime Minister Michel Barnier of France, center, after the no-confidence vote yesterday. Sarah Meyssonnier/Reuters France’s prime minister lost a no-confidence vote French lawmakers passed a no-confidence measure against Prime Minister Michel Barnier and his cabinet yesterday, sending France into a fresh spasm of political turmoil. Barnier is expected to resign soon. France’s lower house of Parliament passed the measure with 331 votes — well above the required majority of 288 votes — after Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally joined the chamber’s leftist coalition. The move leaves France without a clear path to a new budget and threatens to further unsettle credit markets. It could also create a wider opening for the far right. What’s next: Barnier is likely to remain as a caretaker until President Emmanuel Macron names a new prime minister, but weeks of instability are on the horizon. Context: It was the first successful no-confidence vote in France in over 60 years, making Barnier’s three-month-old government the shortest-tenured in the history of France’s Fifth Republic. A head-and-shoulders portrait of Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth after meetings on Capitol Hill yesterday. Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Senators waver on Hegseth for defense secretary A small but pivotal group of Republican senators expressed concern yesterday about Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be defense secretary. Hegseth has been accused of sexual assault, public drunkenness and mismanagement while running veterans’ nonprofits. “Some of these articles are very disturbing,” Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump’s closest allies in Congress, told reporters. “He obviously has a chance to defend himself here, but, you know, some of this stuff is going to be difficult.” Trump yesterday named a senior counselor for trade and manufacturing and a possible overseer of NASA. Here are his latest picks. What’s your most cherished holiday tradition? For many of us, the holidays are full of traditions. Which ones are you most looking forward to this year? Maybe it’s something your family or friends have been doing for decades or a more recent creation that you can’t wait to repeat. Either way, we’d love to know about it. To share your thoughts, fill out this form. We may use your response in an upcoming newsletter. We won’t publish your submission without contacting you first.
Category:ਪ੍ਰੇਸ ਰਿਲੀਜ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸਟੇਟਮੇੰਟ



ਪ੍ਰੇਸ ਰਿਲੀਜ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸਟੇਟਮੇੰਟ
Delhi Student’s Rape Mirrors New Delhi Leadership’s Rape of India, say Indian Minorities
Delhi Student’s Rape Mirrors New Delhi Leadership’s Rape of India, say Indian Minorities
Page Visitors: 2610

Delhi Student’s Rape Mirrors New Delhi Leadership’s Rape of India, say Indian Minorities

http://freedom-post-sikh-nation.blogspot.com/2013/01/delhi-students-rape-mirrors-new-delhi.html

SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 8, 2013 - The murder of Jyoti Singh Pandey, the New Delhi college student who was kidnapped, gang-raped, and died late last month, represents the treatment of India by its politicians, said a human rights group for Indian minorities on Tuesday.

“Thugs like Ms. Pandey’s murderers mirror the behavior of New Delhi’s leadership,” said Bhajan Singh, Founding Director of US-based Organization for Minorities of India (OFMI). “The Indian State habitually promotes instigators of full-scale massacres to the highest political offices. From Narendra Modi to Sumedh Saini and L. K. Advani to Kamal Nath, politicians who use rape, torture, and murder are rewarded with positions of greater and greater power. When India’s rulers are role models for sadism, they can hardly expect the citizenry to display a superior level of morality.”

Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat, directed police to stand down as rioters systematically massacred nearly 2,000 Muslims in 2002. Saini, Director General of Police in Punjab, led death squads against Sikhs in the 1990s. Advani, a senior leader of the Hindu supremacist Bharatiya Janata Party and former Deputy Prime Minister, oversaw the 1992 destruction of the historical Babri Mosque and massacre of over 1,000 Muslims in resultant riots. Nath, Union Cabinet Member for Urban Development, distributed weapons and ordered the murder of Sikhs during the 1984 Delhi Pogrom.

“Protesters who are rightly furious at the atrocious treatment of Ms. Pandey are demanding the death penalty for her six attackers,” remarked Bhajan Singh. “But where is the justice for Christians raped in Orissa in 2008, Muslims raped in Gujarat in 2002, Sikhs raped in Delhi in 1984, or Dalits raped on a daily basis? There is none because the Indian State is in the business, not of justice, but of keeping itself in business.”

Nun Sister Meena Lalita Barwa was gang-raped during anti-Christian riots in Orissa. She survived, but was paraded half-naked past a group of police officers who “ignored her and talked in a ‘very friendly’ manner to her attackers.” After anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat, a Citizen’s Initiative reported “the most bestial forms of sexual violence – including rape, gang rape, mass rape.” In her article “Genocide in Gujarat,” anthropologist Angana Chatterji wrote: “Violence took place within sight of the local police stations.... Police officers often refused to come to the aid of Muslims, or took active part in the violence, to the point of shooting and striking at Muslims as they ran from the mobs.”

The humiliation of Sikh women during the 1984 Delhi Pogrom was one of the most extensive acts of ethnically targeted abuse in Indian history. In its report, “Twenty Years of Impunity,” rights group Ensaaf documented atrocities like the rape of Gurdip Kaur. A mob killed her husband and three of her sons, gang-raped her in front of her youngest son, killed him, and then left her to tell the tale. Many other women, reports Ensaaf, “were raped in front of their families. The rapists then either took the women home with them or left them naked in the streets.” Members of Parliament such as Nath were witnessed offering cash bounties to kill Sikhs, but none were ever prosecuted.

Although the Pandey case has received significant publicity, recent headlines reveal similar assaults on Dalits — the outcastes of Indian society — are a near daily occurrence: Jan. 5 — “Minor Dalit girl raped in Punjab”; Jan. 3 — “Dalit girl raped by engineering student in Haryana”; Jan. 2 — “Dalit alleges gangrape, no action taken so far”; Dec. 19 — “8-year-old Dalit girl raped, killed in Bihar”; Dec. 13 — “Dalit widow gang-raped; 4 arrested”; Dec. 8 — “Pregnant Dalit woman gang-raped.”

A judicial committee headed by J. S. Verma, a former Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice, was appointed on December 22 to identify legislative solutions to the national scourge of sexual assault. Among the solutions suggested so far are swifter trials and tougher penalties for accused assailants.

Questioning the sincerity of the Central Government’s proposed solutions, OFMI’s Press Secretary Arvin Valmuci said: “The hypocrisy of the Indian State is beyond belief. Witness the 1992 arrest of over 100 police officers for the arbitrary detention, torture, and gang-rape of 18 female Dalits from Tamil Nadu. As for swift trials, it took 19 years to convict anyone. As for tough penalties, the harshest sentence was 10 years in prison while most received only two years. When random thugs brutalize an innocent woman, the state talks tough. Yet when the state itself commits mass atrocities against the most marginalized inhabitants of South Asia, there is no justice.”

Torture, claims OFMI, is standard practice for police in most circumstances. Furthermore, a 2011 report by the organization entitled, “Demons Within: The Systematic Practice of Torture by Indian Police,” states: “The practice of rape as a form of torture by police officers is systemic and borders on universal in their interactions with female detainees. Most tragically, many of those abused by the police first approached the authorities to file a report of rape by non-governmental assailants.”

The use of torture is legal under Indian law, which provides no definition of torture or prohibition of its practice. Torture and related abuses by Indian security forces are actually protected by Section 197 of the Indian Criminal Procedure Code, which grants immunity to any government official accused of committing a criminal act in his official capacity. India has, to date, failed to ratify the United Nations’ Convention Against Torture.

About OFMI: Organization for Minorities of India was founded in 2006 to promote the individual rights of Christians, Buddhists, Dalits, Muslims, Sikhs, and other minorities of South Asian origin, particularly those marginalized by the Hindu caste system. OFMI seeks to encourage secularism, the liberation of oppressed peoples, preservation of human rights, and the equality of all humanity. Visit OFMI online at www.OFMI.org.

Media Inquiries:

Bhajan Singh

Founding Director, OFMI

Email: singh@ofmi.org

©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.