Punjab and Haryana HC issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder, his son in I-T case
https://www.mid-day.com/…/high-court-issues-notice…/20662175
The department, in a complaint, had alleged that both were beneficiaries of foreign assets maintained and controlled through various business entities and also of foreign bank accounts maintained with a bank in Geneva.
https://www.moneycontrol.com/…/punjab-and-haryana-hc-issues…
(2)
Punjab: High court notice to Capt Amarinder, son Raninder in tax evasion case
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articles…/68674894.cms
(3)
HC issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder his son in I-T case
he department, in a complaint, had alleged that both were beneficiaries of foreign assets maintained and controlled through various business entities and also of foreign bank accounts maintained with a bank in Geneva. PTI CHS VSD KJ
https://www.theweek.in/…/2…/04/01/lgd34-ch-hc-amarinder.html
(4)
https://www.business-standard.com/…/hc-issues-notices-to-pu…
HC issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder, his son in I-T case
Press Trust of India | Chandigarh
Last Updated at April 1, 2019 20:07 IST
The Punjab and Haryana High Court Monday issued notices to Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh and his son Raninder Singh in an Income Tax case.
The court of Justice Rajbir Sehrawat issued notices to both of them for April 25, senior advocate Chetan Mittal, the counsel for Income Tax Department said.
The Income Tax Department had moved the high court against the November 2018 order of the court of Additional Sessions Judge Ludhiana, quashing the summoning order passed against Amarinder Singh and his son, Raninder Singh, in this case.
The trial court had earlier issued summons to both of them to appear personally for the hearing.
Both were facing accusations of making false statements, and willful omission in providing required information to the Income Tax Department, which had filed a criminal complaint against them before a court in Ludhiana in 2016.
The department, in a complaint, had alleged that both were beneficiaries of foreign assets maintained and controlled through various business entities and also of foreign bank accounts maintained with a bank in Geneva.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.
(5)
https://www.mid-day.com/…/high-court-issues-notice…/20662175
High Court issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder Singh
Updated: Apr 01, 2019, 20:29 IST | PTI
The court of Justice Rajbir Sehrawat issued notices to both of them for April 25, senior advocate Chetan Mittal, the counsel for Income Tax Department said
High Court issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder Singh
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court Monday issued notices to Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh and his son Raninder Singh in an Income Tax case.
The court of Justice Rajbir Sehrawat issued notices to both of them for April 25, senior advocate Chetan Mittal, the counsel for Income Tax Department said.
The Income Tax Department had moved the high court against the November 2018 order of the court of Additional Sessions Judge Ludhiana, quashing the summoning order passed against Amarinder Singh and his son, Raninder Singh, in this case.
The trial court had earlier issued summons to both of them to appear personally for the hearing.
Both were facing accusations of making false statements, and willful omission in providing required information to the Income Tax Department, which had filed a criminal complaint against them before a court in Ludhiana in 2016.
The department, in a complaint, had alleged that both were beneficiaries of foreign assets maintained and controlled through various business entities and also of foreign bank accounts maintained with a bank in Geneva.
(6)
https://www.tribuneindia.com/…/hc-issues-notice…/751681.html
Punjab
Posted at: Apr 1, 2019, 9:01 PM; last updated: Apr 1, 2019, 9:01 PM (IST)
HC issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder, his son in I-T case
HC issues notices to Punjab CM Amarinder, his son in I-T case
Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh. File photo
Chandigarh, April 1, 2019
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday issued notices to Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh and his son Raninder Singh in an Income Tax case.
The court of Justice Rajbir Sehrawat issued notices to both of them for April 25, senior advocate Chetan Mittal, the counsel for Income Tax Department said.
The Income Tax Department had moved the high court against the November 2018 order of the court of Additional Sessions Judge Ludhiana, quashing the summoning order passed against Amarinder Singh and his son, Raninder Singh, in this case.
The trial court had earlier issued summons to both of them to appear personally for the hearing.
Both were facing accusations of making false statements, and wilful omission in providing required information to the Income Tax Department, which had filed a criminal complaint against them before a court in Ludhiana in 2016.
The department, in a complaint, had alleged that both were beneficiaries of foreign assets maintained and controlled through various business entities and also of foreign bank accounts maintained with a bank in Geneva. — PTI
……………………
Punjab
Posted at: Mar 29, 2018, 1:23 AM; last updated: Mar 29, 2018, 2:26 PM (IST)
Lookout circular for Capt’s son-in-law
https://www.tribuneindia.com/…/lookout-circular…/565394.html
Lookout circular for Capt’s son-in-law
Simbhaoli Sugars chairman Gurmit Singh Mann also was named among the 12 accused in the case. Syed Ali Ahmed::Tribune News Service: New Delhi, March 28, 2018
The CBI has issued a lookout circular against Gurpal Singh, son-in-law of Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh, and three others accused in the Simbhaoli Sugar Mills scam of Rs 97.85 crore, sources said.
The three others against whom the CBI has issued a lookout circular are mill chief executive officer GSE Rao, chief finance officer Sanjay Thaparia and executive director Gursimran Kaur.
The CBI registered a case against the accused on February 25 for the alleged bank loan of Rs 97.85 crore and default of Rs 110 crore. According to the FIR, there were two loans, both from the Oriental Bank of Commerce, under probe — a Rs 97.85 crore loan which was declared fraud in 2015, and a corporate loan of Rs 110 crore used to repay the previous loan. The second loan was declared NPA (non-performing asset) on November 29, 2016.
The bank complained to the CBI on November 17, 2017, but the agency registered the case only on February 22. Among the 12 accused booked in the case, Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Limited chairman Gurmit Singh Mann’s name was also included. The mill is located in Hapur in Uttar Pradesh.
…………………
https://www.mid-day.com/…/high-court-issues-notice…/20662175
Most relevant Added:
As To Who Will Conclude about the Congress and Badal Family? What?
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=19047
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3UOo1NOlO4
Behbal Kalan Golikand: New Disclosure By SIT In High Court, Police Didn't Fire Bullets…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3UOo1NOlO4
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17357_0_1_0_M14
As To Why Badal Family and the Coterie from SAD Politically Defaming SIT or What? - Analysis By: Balbir Singh Sooch
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17357_0_1_0_M14
Punjab Sacrilege Panel Chief Takes Sukhbir Badal to Court for “false, derogatory and defamatory” statements against him
1. “Punjab sacrilege panel chief takes Sukhbir to court: Saurabh Malik; Tribune News Service; Chandigarh, February 7, 2019: Last updated: Feb 8, 2019, 7:11 AM (IST)
2. A former judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Ranjit Singh, has filed a criminal complaint against Punjab’s former Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal and MLA Bikram Singh Majithia for “false, derogatory and defamatory” statements against him.
3. Justice Ranjit Singh has asserted that the intention was to bring into disrepute him and the Commission of Inquiry (CoI) headed by him to look into the cases of sacrilege in Punjab during the previous SAD-BJP regime.
4. Dubbing the panel report as “worth Rs 5” allegedly by Sukhbir, Majithia and other SAD members has been quoted as an “instance of wilful disrepute”.
5. Justice Ranjit Singh has also referred to other instances where Sukhbir made statements against the commission and its head, which allegedly brought disrepute.
6. If the first-of-its-kind plea is allowed, the respondents may find themselves facing proceedings for simple imprisonment for a term extending up to six months, or fine, or both.
7. Justice Ranjit Singh has asserted that he, as the chairman of the CoI, executed his duties and functions in a non-partisan manner and with honesty, integrity and a great sense of responsibility.
8. Since the inquiry pertains to incidents and occurrences taking place while the government helmed by Sukhbir was in power, it was natural that the CoI’s findings and recommendations did not go down well with him and certain members of the SAD, he contended, adding that as a result, Sukhbir and his associates embarked upon a tirade to publicly undermine and ridicule the CoI and the complainant. Justice Ranjit Singh has invoked the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, for seeking action. Section 10A of the Act deals with penalty for acts calculated to bring the commission or any of its members into disrepute”. Saurabh Malik; Tribune News Service; Chandigarh
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17357_0_1_0_M14
9. As To Why Badal Family and the Coterie from SAD Politically Defaming SIT or What? - Analysis By: Balbir Singh Sooch
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17357_0_1_0_M14
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17237_0_1_0_C
10. The Congress and Badal Family Out To Disturb Peace Jointly In Punjab - Analysis by: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17237_0_1_0_C
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/1865115106856917
11. Parkash Badal and Sukhbir Badal Strategy to Create a Fear Psychosis by Raising the Bogey of Threat to Peace and Harmony
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/1865115106856917
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17118_0_1_0_C
12. Sikh Need Justice for the Tragedies from the Year 1978 Onward
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17118_0_1_0_C
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17084_0_1_0_C
(i) India: The apprehension of serious danger to Navjot Singh Sidhu - By: Balbir Singh Sooch
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17084_0_1_0_C
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17373_0_1_0_C
(ii) Navjot Singh Sidhu Facing Threat to His Life - Highlights by: Balbir Singh Sooch
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=17373_0_1_0_C
13. ‘The Bargari Morcha-Dharna demands at Bargari Village in District Faridkot, Punjab led by parallel Jathedar Dhian Singh Mand include as under:
(i) To implement in the letter and spirit of the Justice Ranjit Singh Commission’s report (Now a public document), fully debated on August 28, 2018 in the Assembly of Punjab-The Punjab Vidhan Sabha as the SIT and the Justice Ranjit Singh Commission have already given detail at Dera Sacha Sauda followers in the sacrilege cases;
(ii) Also ‘indicted former Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal in the 2015 Guru Granth Sahib sacrilege case, adding that he was well aware of the situation developing at Kotkapura and the subsequent firings ordered’ as being a highly sensitive matter ignored, intentionally and deliberately, since then and being continued so ;
(iii) The firings ordered is being a highly sensitive matter and it was the most cruel act similar to ‘The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, also known as the Amritsar massacre, took place on 13 April 1919 when a crowd of nonviolent protesters, along with Baishakhi pilgrims, who had gathered in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, were fired upon by troops of the British Indian Army under the command of Colonel Reginald Dyer’.
(iv) But here is the Badal Family involved and at whose instance and in lieu of what and obviously also being helped by CM Captain Amarinder Singh?
(v) Will ‘The Dharna In Bargari’, ‘The dharna at Bargari Village in District Faridkot, Punjab led by parallel Jathedar Dhian Singh Mand get answer to all this now.?
       AND
(vi) To secure the release of Sikh political detainees who have served their jail terms immediately.
Highlights forwarded by: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch
http://sikhvicharmanch.com/home.htm
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355
Punjab Sacrilege Panel Chief Takes Sukhbir Badal to Court for “false, derogatory and defamatory” statements against him
As To Who Will Conclude about the Congress and Badal Family?               What?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3UOo1NOlO4
Behbal Kalan Golikand: New Disclosure By SIT In High Court, Police Didn't Fire Bullets…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3UOo1NOlO4
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=19047
……………………………………..
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articles…/67892502.cms
City Centre case: Orders on Saini’s plea reserved
The next date of hearing of the case in the court of sessions judge Gurbir Singh is on February 21, 2019.
…………………………………
Punjab
Posted at: Feb 8, 2019, 7:03 AM; last updated: Feb 8, 2019, 9:46 AM (IST)
City Centre case: Order on ex-DGP’s plea reserved
https://www.tribuneindia.com/…/city-centre-case…/725577.html
City Centre case: Order on ex-DGP’s plea reserved
Legal Correspondent: Ludhiana, February 7, 2019
The court of Sessions Judge Gurbir Singh today reserved orders on former DGP Sumedh Singh Saini’s plea for making him party in the City Centre case.
Rumours of Saini coming to court personally kept the cops on toes. Several cops were deployed in the court complex in plain clothes.
Saini has urged the court to hear him before taking any decision on the closure report filed by the Vigilance Bureau giving a clean chit to Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh and all other accused in the City Centre case.
The court heard arguments advanced by Saini’s lawyer and from prosecution side. Saini has also sought the permission of the court to produce certain material information in a sealed cover, which he claims to be sensitive.
During Capt Amarinder’s previous tenure as CM, the City Centre project was envisaged to develop a multiplex, a mall, leisure parks and other commercial hubs with a rooftop helipad on 25 acres in Ludhiana. The alleged “Rs 1,144-crore scam” had come to light in September 2006. Last year, the Vigilance Bureau had filed the closure report.
The case will come up for hearing on February 21, 2019
……………………………
Ludhiana City Centre scam haunts Punjab CM Amarinder Singh
https://www.indiatoday.in/…/ludhiana-city-centre-scam-haunt…
The Ludhiana Improvement Trust recently moved an objection petition in the court for not closing the case against Amarinder Singh
ADVERTISEMENT
Manjeet Sehgal
Chandigarh
February 2, 2019UPDATED: February 2, 2019 22:43 IST
Ludhiana City Centre scam haunts Punjab CM Amarinder Singh
Navjot Singh Sidhu's 'Amarinder is not my Captain' statement had not gone down well with the Punjab chief minister's camp. (Photo: PTI)
HIGHLIGHTS
Ludhiana Improvement Trust comes under Navjot Singh Sidhu's department
Navjot Singh Sidhu last year refused to accept Amarinder Singh as his "captain"
According to the objection petition, Amarinder Singh and 32 others caused losses to the tune of Rs 1144 crore
A new development in the infamous Rs 1144 crore Ludhiana City Centre scam may lead to fresh tensions between Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh and his cabinet colleague Navjot Singh Sidhu who last year refused to accept him as his "captain".
Touted as one of the biggest projects in the state, the Ludhiana City Centre plan was rolled out in 2006. To be spread over 25 acres, the project was proposed to have shopping malls, multiplexes, residential apartments, helipad and parking slot. The project site on Pakhowal Road of Ludhiana, however, is currently in ruins.
CM Amarinder Singh, his son and son-in-law are among the accused in the case, alleging a private builder was favoured during Singh's previous term as CM.
The Ludhiana Improvement Trust recently moved an objection petition in the court for not closing the case against Amarinder Singh. The trust comes under Navjot Singh Sidhu's department which may add to the feud between the two.
According to the objection petition, Amarinder Singh and 32 others caused losses to the tune of Rs 1144 crore to the state exchequer, hence the case should not be closed.
Interestingly, the vigilance department had given a clean chit to Amarinder Singh and others accused in the case besides moving a closure report in the Ludhiana Sessions Court.
Now the affidavit moved by the Ludhiana Improvement Trust has not only added to the woes of Amarinder Singh but has also exposed the cracks between Sidhu and Singh.
Not only the local bodies department but former DGP Punjab Sumedh Singh Saini, who was the then chief of vigilance department, had also moved an affidavit in the court.
The case against Amarinder Singh and others accused was registered by the then Akali Dal-BJP government on March 23, 2007. The vigilance department had moved a 130-page chargesheet in the court in December 2007.
Later, a closure report was moved in Ludhiana court by the vigilance department on August 19, 2018. The case is still pending in the court.
Also read | Punjab cabinet ministers slam Navjot Singh Sidhu for his comment on Captain Amarinder
Also watch | Navjot Singh Sidhu vs Amarinder Singh: Who is the captain of Punjab?
https://www.indiatoday.in/…/ludhiana-city-centre-scam-haunt…
https://www.indiatoday.in/…/punjab-cabinet-ministers-slam-n…
……………………………………..
Posted at: Feb 2, 2019, 6:46 AM; last updated: Feb 2, 2019, 6:46 AM (IST)
City Centre case adjourned till Feb 7, 2019
https://www.tribuneindia.com/…/city-centre-case…/722397.html
FacebookTwitterEmailPrint
Also in this section
Cong leaders of Backward Classes seek fair share in ticket allocation
Water bus to be replaced with shikaras at Harike, says Sidhu
Mining norms violated in Ropar: NGT panel report
Victim’s cousin among 3
Fraud: Markfed’s Dhuri manager suspended
Legal Correspondent
Ludhiana, February 1, 2019
The court of Sessions Judge Gurbir Singh today adjourned the hearing in the alleged City Centre scam till February 7 after hearing the arguments advanced by Director prosecution, Punjab, Vijay Singla.
He opposed the contentions of former DGP Sumedh Singh Saini’s plea for making him party in the case and hear him before taking any decision on the closure report filed by the Vigilance Bureau.
The arguments continued for about four hours today. After conclusion of arguments by Director prosecution and other lawyers, Saini’s lawyer sought time to advance more arguments. Now on the next date of hearing, Saini’s lawyer will advance arguments.
Singla stressed that Saini was having no locus standi to file the plea. He claimed that Saini signed no document before the registration of the FIR in the present case. So, he cannot be termed as complainant in the case. The case would come up for hearing on February 7.
……………………………………………………
Ex-DGP has no locus standi in the case: Prosecution
https://indianexpress.com/…/ex-dgp-has-no-locus-standi-in-…/
On Friday, director prosecution Vijay Singla and district attorney Ravinder Abrol, arguing against the Saini’s plea to become party in the case, said that the former DGP has no locus standi in the case.
By Express News Service |
Ludhiana |
Published: February 2, 2019 1:26:01 am

RELATED NEWS
NGT to Punjab: Immediately stop illegal mining in rivers
Punjab story shows gap between ‘promise’ and ‘implementation’ of loan waiver scheme
Allow all pilgrims to visit Kartarpur Sahib gurdwara , not just Sikhs: Amarinder
The court has fixed February 7 as the next date of hearing.
The prosecution Friday concluded its arguments against an application moved by former DGP Punjab Sumedh Singh Saini in the alleged Rs 1,144-crore Ludhiana City Centre scam in the court of district and sessions judge Gurbir Singh.
Advertising
Questioning the clean chit given to Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh and other accused in the case, Saini on November 28, 2018 had filed an application stating that he should be heard once before the court accepts cancellation report filed by vigilance and that he has ‘sensitive information’ (being the director vigilance from 2007-2012), which he wants to submit in a sealed envelope.
On Friday, director prosecution Vijay Singla and district attorney Ravinder Abrol, arguing against the Saini’s plea to become party in the case, said that the former DGP has no locus standi in the case. They argued that Saini was not the signatory to any documents related to the case or project nor did he participate in any proceedings of the case. They further argued that Saini is neither an informant nor the aggrieved in the case. The prosecution also argued that the plea of former SSP Kanwarjit Singh Sandhu was rejected by the same court noting that it is the “state of Punjab”, which is the complainant in the case.
During the last hearing, Saini’s counsel Ramanpreet Singh Sandhu had argued that two departments of Punjab government were taking different stands in two courts related to the case. He had argued that while vigilance department in this court was saying that there was no scam at all and all accused including the CM and representatives of M/S Today Homes were falsely implicated, their stand was completely opposite in the court of additional district judge Kuldeep Kumar Kareer. In that court, the local bodies department is fighting against compensation awarded to the Today Homes and has contended that the company had committed a fraud causing loss to the state exchequer.
The prosecution Friday said that contents of affidavit furnished by Ludhiana Improvement Trust (LIT) chairman PS Gill in court of Kareer might not be completely correct and that the LIT was recipient of funds collected by the Today Homes for the project. “Today, prosecution has said that affidavit filed by their own IAS officer was wrong. This is being done to save Capt Amarinder Singh. They have said in the court that objections filed by their own IAS officer against Today Homes were wrong. Now, it is government’s own vigilance department is pitted against the LIT here to save the CM,” said Sandhu.
As to why CM Amarinder Singh Is Non- Functional-Weakened-Damaged As CM PUNJAB?
OR
As to why CM Amarinder Singh fall in or into line conform with Akalis or with accepted behavior of Known Corrupts?
https://www.mid-day.com/…/high-court-issues-notice…/20662175
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articles…/68674894.cms
Observation By: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch
Please refer all the following allegations and proceedings including articles to conclude the truth and answers of the questions: SUBMISSION AND THANKS
https://www.mid-day.com/…/high-court-issues-notice…/20662175