ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ



ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੂਚ (ਵਕੀਲ)
NO Compromise on Security and Safety either By India or Pakistan
NO Compromise on Security and Safety either By India or Pakistan
Page Visitors: 2449

NO Compromise on Security and Safety either By India or Pakistan
Highlights By: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch
1. First of all, there is nothing wrong to repeat that the Positivity of PM Modi and the central agencies matter after Navjot Singh Sidhu, Pakistan PM Imran Khan and his army’s determination on Kartarpur Corridor must be appreciated unconditionally. Thereafter, whoever was in ‘credit war’ negatively must be ignored keeping in view their destructive approach between India and Pakistan.
2. India wants Pak to address misgivings before next Kartarpur meet, whereas Pakistan finds it as incomprehensible-unintelligible, inconceivable Indian move to reschedule Kartarpur meet: The Tribune, Chandigarh
3. India on Friday, March 29, 2019 summoned Pakistan’s deputy high commissioner in New Delhi and conveyed concerns over the presence of several Khalistani separatists in a committee appointed by Pakistan on the corridor. Last updated: March 29, 2019, 2:51 PM (IST): The Tribune, Chandigarh
Who is doing what, how and why?
4. Was India trying to justify inadvertently PM Imran Khan’s statement, “The relations to remain tense till the elections-2019 are not over in India”?
5. PM Imran Khan’s earlier statement as reported, “PM Imran Khan says Indo-Pak relations to remain tense till elections in India”: THE HINDU; “Khan said shadows of war were still hovering over Pakistan and India as Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration could go for “another misadventure” before the general elections. “The danger is not over. The situation will remain tense till forthcoming general elections in India”. Wednesday, 27 March 2019 | PTI | Islamabad: DAILY PIONEER
REBUTTAL BY PAKISTAN:
(i) Pakistan finds it as incomprehensible-unintelligible, inconceivable Indian move to reschedule Kartarpur meet.
(ii) “The next meeting of technical experts on the Kartarpur corridor was earlier scheduled in Wagah on the Pakistani side of the border on April 2, 2019 and was “jointly agreed by both sides”
(iii) “The meeting was to discuss and find consensus on outstanding issues,” Mohammad Faisal, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, tweeted following a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Friday.
(iv) “Last-minute postponement without seeking views from Pakistan especially after the productive technical meeting on March 19, 2019 is incomprehensible,” Faisal tweeted.
(v) Faisal’s response comes shortly after India said it had “sought clarifications from Pakistan on key proposals put forward by India at the last meeting held in Attari to discuss the modalities of the Kartarpur Sahib Corridor”.
(vi) An MEA statement in India said it had been conveyed to the Paksitani side that the next meeting on the modalities of the corridor could be scheduled at an appropriate time after receiving Pakistan’s response.
(vii) In order to take forward the infrastructure development for the corridor in an expeditious manner, India has proposed to hold another meeting of technical experts in mid-April to resolve outstanding issues at the zero point agreed to at the last meeting, the statement said”. Last updated: March 29, 2019, 2:51 PM (IST): The Tribune, Chandigarh.
Under the circumstances as to who can decide, “Who is doing what, how and why”?
Highlights By: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch|
First Posted On: March 29, 2019, 10:16 PM (IST)
http://sikhvicharmanch.com/home.htm

https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355

NO Compromise on Security and Safety either By India or Pakistan
sikhvicharmanch.com
Welcome to www.sikhvicharmanch.com
ਸ. ਹਰਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਭੰਵਰ, ਨਿਧੜਕ ਲੇਖਕ ਸਾਹਿਤਕਾਰ, ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰ ਤੇ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਦਾ ਸਨਮਾਨ

©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.